How can we determine the length, breadth and thickness of a rectangular glass slab without simply measuring it directly? Instead of relying on just one technique, we explored several ideas from physics — projection, optics, photography and parallax.
Our objective was to determine the three dimensions of a rectangular glass slab using indirect methods. Each method approached the same problem from a different physics concept.
Using light and geometrical projection.
Using image formation and refraction.
Turning pixels into physical dimensions.
Using apparent displacement.
The attempt that didn't quite work.
Our first idea was simple: if light travels in straight lines, could the shadow of the glass slab reveal its dimensions?
In a uniform medium, light travels approximately in straight lines. When light falls on an object, a shadow or projection is formed. By comparing this projection with a known reference and applying geometrical similarity, the dimensions of the glass slab can be estimated.
The shadow is a geometrical projection. Its dimensions depend on the dimensions of the slab and the geometry of the light-source and screen arrangement.
The long projected edge can be compared with a known reference to determine the length of the glass slab.
The transverse projected dimension can similarly be calibrated using the reference object.
By changing the orientation of the glass slab, its smaller thickness dimension can also be obtained from the projection.
Unknown dimension ≈ Known reference dimension ×
(Projected slab dimension ÷ Projected reference dimension)
After shadows, we moved into geometrical optics and explored how refraction and image formation could provide information about the glass slab.
When light passes from one medium to another, its speed changes and its direction may change. This phenomenon is called refraction. A plane-parallel glass slab produces a measurable optical displacement that can be related to its thickness.
Instead of physically measuring every edge, we use the behaviour of light and the resulting image displacement to obtain information about the slab.
The longitudinal geometry of the setup can be used to obtain the required dimension.
The slab can be oriented so that the transverse dimension is represented in the optical arrangement.
The apparent displacement caused by refraction can be related to the actual thickness.
n₁ sin i = n₂ sin r
For a plane-parallel slab:
d = t · sin(i − r) / cos r
Then came a more modern approach: instead of measuring the glass slab directly, we measured it inside a photograph.
A digital photograph consists of pixels. If an object of known physical size is placed in the same image as the glass slab, the ratio between its actual size and pixel size provides a scale factor. The pixel dimensions of the slab can then be converted into physical dimensions.
Scale = Actual size of the reference object ÷ The size of the reference object in pixels
Actual slab dimension =
Slab dimension in pixels × Scale
Measure the long edge in pixels and multiply it by the calibrated physical scale.
Measure the shorter top-view dimension and use the same pixel-to-length calibration.
Use a front or side photograph in which the thickness is clearly visible.
Our final main approach changed the position of the observer rather than the glass slab.
Parallax is the apparent displacement of an object when it is viewed from different positions. When the observer moves through a known baseline, the apparent position of the object changes. This displacement can be analysed using geometry.
The glass slab remains stationary. The observer moves, producing an apparent shift that contains information about the geometry.
The apparent positions of the relevant edges can be compared from different viewpoints.
A lateral viewing arrangement can be used to analyse the transverse dimension.
The apparent displacement between surfaces can be used to infer the slab's thickness.
θ ≈ apparent displacement ÷ observation distance
The exact final equation depends on the geometry of the setup.
After completing our four main approaches, we also considered a free-fall method. The idea was to use the motion of a falling object and timing information to obtain a measurement indirectly.
And even apart from the ball, several practical difficulties would have affected the accuracy of the method.
After going through the methods, we can now look at the observations collected during the experiment.
| Dimension | Image Size (cm) | u (cm) | v (cm) | Measured Dimension (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (L) | 4.7 | 27.5 | 19.0 | 8.46 |
| Breadth (B) | 3.4 | 22.8 | 16.8 | 6.05 |
| Thickness (t) | 1.0 | 24.5 | 19.5 | 1.83 |
| Observation | Image Size (cm) | u (cm) | v (cm) | Measured Value (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.7 | 29.5 | 1.5 | 8.46 |
| B | 3.4 | 23.8 | 13.3 | 6.05 |
| T | 1.0 | 27.5 | 15.0 | 1.83 |
| Dimension | Reference Actual (cm) | Reference Pixels | Glass Slab Pixels | Scale (cm/pixel) | Calculated (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 9.30 | 1374.1 | 1179.7 | 0.00677 | 7.98 |
| Breadth | 9.30 | 1422.0 | 787.6 | 0.00654 | 5.15 |
| Thickness | 4.30 | 596.1 | 320.4 | 0.00721 | 2.31 |
| Dimension | Reference Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Length (L) | 8.0 | cm |
| Breadth (B) | 5.3 | cm |
| Thickness / Height (t) | 2.3 | cm |
Our reference dimensions were: Length = 8.0 cm, Breadth = 5.3 cm, Thickness = 2.3 cm .
| Method | Dimension | Reference (cm) | Measured (cm) | Percentage Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow | Length | 8.00 | 8.46 | 5.75% |
| Breadth | 5.30 | 6.05 | 14.15% | |
| Thickness | 2.30 | 1.83 | 20.43% | |
| Optical | Length | 8.00 | 8.46 | 5.75% |
| Breadth | 5.30 | 6.05 | 14.15% | |
| Thickness | 2.30 | 1.83 | 20.43% | |
| Photography | Length | 8.00 | 7.98 | 0.25% |
| Breadth | 5.30 | 5.15 | 2.83% | |
| Thickness | 2.30 | 2.31 | 0.43% |
And after all that physics... sometimes the simplest solution wins. 😭
We started with a simple glass slab and turned it into a full exploration through shadows, optics, photography, parallax, calculations — and even a free-fall attempt that had its own plot twist.
The real lesson? Physics isn't always about finding the easiest way to get an answer. Sometimes, it's about discovering how many different ways you can get there.
Started the journey
Found new perspectives
Goes beyond answers
SAME QUESTIONS. BRIGHTER PERSPECTIVE.